Unlike FDM supports, which are usually lattice or grid-like, SLA supports are scaffolding tree-like structures with very thin tips. They’re easy to remove and they leave little to no traces on the printed object’s surface when removed. This also means that an insufficient number of supports can lead to unwanted effects – e.g. heavy objects can detach during the print. Supports go hand in hand with object orientation – by rotating the object to an optimal position, you can minimize the need for supports.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/305b9/305b918ab0248ce7f26bb39fc62cf4b585a10ace" alt=""
You can get rid of tons of supports if you rotate the object to an optimal position. Teeth on this T-rex head can be printed without supports
Also, keep in mind that removing the supports can leave tiny marks on the surface, so if your object has certain areas that should be completely flawless (an ornament on a piece of jewelry, face of an action figure), try to keep the supports away from them.
PrusaSlicer 2.0 is fully equipped for automatic tree support generation. How does it work?
- Select the object that requires supports
- Click the SLA support points icon
- Choose the support point density and minimal points distance (default values should work fine for a majority of objects)
- Click Auto-generate points and wait until the process is finished
- Use the Preview mode to inspect whether all “islands” are supported – if not, you can manually adjust the supports.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/503b3/503b335a7bd3b1698892751d8fd5bbce077c0103" alt=""
SLA Support menu in PrusaSlicer
Another thing that you should consider using is the pad. The pad (enabled by default) is a large structure at the base of the print, which serves as the foundation for the supports. While it’s possible to have supports printed directly on the aluminum printing platform, the pad will ensure much better stability.
Manual support editing
In some cases, the automatic support generation doesn’t deliver a 100% perfect result – this is normal since imported objects can be infinitely complex. We’re constantly improving our support generation subroutines to prevent these situations from happening. Either way, on certain occasions, supports have to be added manually – this can be done even when there are already auto-generated supports in place.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45d47/45d478475403c766cebea8426dbc06bf4a6b7613" alt=""
Comparison of automatically generated supports and manually edited supports
Click the Manual Editing button. Previously generated supports will temporarily disappear to give you a better overview of the model. Use the left mouse button to add new support points. You can tweak the support thickness in manual editing mode by using the Head diameter slider, or you can go to Print settings – Supports and modify the following parameters to increase the thickness of supports:
- Support head front diameter: 0.6 mm
- Support head penetration: 0.6 mm
- Support pillar diameter: 1.3 mm
Useful shortcuts
Shift + Left mouse drag Add multiple points to the selection
CTRL + Left mouse click Add single support point to the selection
ALT + Left mouse click Remove single support point from the selection
ALT + Left mouse drag Remove multiple points from the selection
CTRL + A Select all points
CTRL + Mouse Wheel Move the clipping plane
5 comments
Probably not. Does not make sense for Print speeds etc with FFF printing. Just looks cool.
The very same object (a simple post cap) sliced in latest CURA 4.13.1 with tree support takes 7h52m and 125g of filament, while the latest PrusaSlicer 2.4.1 requires 11h16m and 200.5g of filament with its "standard" supports.
Same (default) settings, same printer (MK3), original Prusa printer profiles. Sure there may be differences in detail (e.g. the PrusaSlicer uses 4 top layers as default, where Cura with original Prusa profile uses only 3), but those only make a difference of a few minutes and a gram or two in filament consumption and don't change the overall picture.
Supports are not the forte of PrusaSlicer (never have been) and you should better acknowledge that and try to improve, rather than dismissing this topic.
The support head diameter (when manually editing tree supports) can vary. When you click on the model, the current head diameter is used, so you can have tiny connection to the model, thick and extra thick one all at once. However the rest of the support settings can only be changed either globally or for individual objects. You cannot have different support base diameter on the same model at the moment.
I think we will eventually, but there are other considerations with FFF than SLA printing. Even more so when you want to use the MMU2S. We always try to cover most edge-cases as well as general use before releasing a new feature. You can also use another program, like Meshmixer, to generate the tree supports.
Does it involve meshmixer ?